I like that my district has this free open sourced option because it allows "sky's the limit" in my instruction and communication with my colleagues and parents.
Madura and DeDe (2010) use a virtual world for their students and create simulated situations that are easy to navigate around and there isn't a huge learning curve. I feel using these type of big programs and the updated versions always seem to bring a huge learning curve. If administrators need to be consistent and accurate with the input of their information, this can create a high anxiety situation. Why not have a program that is easy to learn and accessible from anywhere from the world.
Hall, D. (2008). The Technology Director’s Guide to Leadership. ISTE ISBN 978-1-56484-244-2.
Madura, J.C. and DeDe, C. (2010). Assessment technology and change. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, Vol. 42,3, pp. 309-328. Retrieved from: http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ882508.pdf.
Picciano,
A. G. (2011). Educational
leadership
and planning for technology
(5th
ed.). Hunter College,
NY: Allyn & Bacon.
I would love if our school district used another application rather than Microsoft Outlook. Imagine the possibilities! I have to agree with you that using Google for example gives staff and students more accessibility for those on the go. I also think that these programs are easier to learn. I wonder why more school districts and universities continue to use Microsoft Outlook. I wonder if it a security reason?
ReplyDeleteI agree with you that it is important that educational technology programs need to be accessible from anywhere and easy to learn. Administrators and technology coordinators must be conscientious of this when deciding on educational technology applications, software, and hardware. More students and staff members are likely to use if it is easy to use and accessible from anywhere at any time. I would love it if I had more accessibility from home and from my phone or Kindle. Thanks Maggie!